NYSBirds-L has no web-accessible long-term archive, so this message was
cut and pasted verbatim from the short-term NYSBirds-L list archive on
birdingonthe.net
Subject: Postings on sensitive species (e.g. owls)
From: Angus Wilson
Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2004 15:19:39 -0500
Hi All,
Rob Jett makes a valid point in questioning the apparent conflict
with existing practices with regard to the posting of directions for
the Central Park Boreal Owl on public lists. In return, Phil
Jeffrey's response (follow the links on his earlier message to
NYSBIRDS-L) makes a cogent argument for why the rules might be broken
in this case. It's a difficult call either way; balancing important
concerns for the bird's welfare with needs for open exchange of bird
sightings. Thankfully, the debate has been polite and
information-based and I would imagine that a variety of opinions
remain. Other outlets of bird news might choose (as a matter of
principal) to be less specific about giving directions and things
might change on this forum even, if evidence of abuse comes to light.
Yesterday evening, I was simultaneously excited and concerned by
Scott Harber's posts to several lists in the Tri-state area. I had
visions of a mob scene this morning, with flash guns exploding and
birders flinging hapless mice at the owl to get better looks etc etc.
My memories of poor behavior at the Boreal that showed up in
Connecticut a decade or so ago are less than pleasant. Fortunately,
the crowd this morning was well-behaved (during my brief visit at
least) and were neatly separated from the owl tree by a knee high
fence. This symbolic boundary was respected and the bird was
relatively high up but well-exposed, giving superb views without any
direct disturbance. Presumably, the owl selected this spot itself
during the night and today was awake, occasionally glancing at the
birders below but otherwise surveying the surrounding trees - perhaps
keeping an eye out for Pale Male and friends? I have no idea how
typical this type of diurnal activity is for Boreal Owls. Certainly
the constant noise and bustle of New York City must be quite a change
from the relative silence of the Canadian boreal forest!!
I echo the request from Lloyd Spitalnik and Phil Jeffrey for birders
and photographers alike to behave sensibly. Perhaps the presence of
onlookers will keep the roosting owl safe from predators or
uninformed members of the public?? In terms of less rare species
(Snowy, Short-eared, Saw-Whet etc), I favor giving minimal directions
in posts. Most birders should be able to find these species
themselves, even if it takes a year or two of searching in the right
habitat before chancing upon the target. For these more regular
visitors, the welfare of the bird outweighs the need to share the
sighting in explicit detail. After all, the experience is much
sweeter to have found your own bird rather than have it pointed out
to you.
That's my 2 cents. Given the discovery of two Boreal Owls this
weekend at opposite ends of the state (Region 1 and Region 10), it
seems very likely that there are others waiting to be discovered.
Congratulations to Jim Demas and Peter Post for a great find. Last
but not least, please remember that Boreal Owl is a NYSARC review
species and we would appreciate written reports and photographs
(visit our web site for the on-line reporting form:
http://www.nybirds.org/NYSARC/goodreport.htm).
Cheers, Angus Wilson
New York City